"Suspect in Shooting Near White House Arrested in Pennsylvania

[url]/Main#Profile?uid=13870957181972020948[/url]:
alguém tem essalei em português?

é algo muito sério lei marcial, elembrando que há paísescomo taiwan e síria em que a lei marcial durou várias décadas.

Judge whacks Obama in eligibility case

'Defendant has failed to enlighten the court with legal authority'

A Georgia judge has refused a demand from Barack Obama to quash a
subpoena to appear at a series of administration hearings Jan. 26 at
which residents of the state are challenging, as allowed under a state
law, his name on the 2012 presidential ballot.

.

http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/obama-argues-against-appe…ity-hearing/
a defense strategy for a number of state-level challenges to his
candidacy in 2012 which argue that states have nothing to do with the
eligibility of presidential candidates.

.

“Presidential electors and Congress, not the state of Georgia, hold
the constitutional responsibility for determining the qualifications of
presidential candidates,” Obama’s lawyer argued in a motion to quash a
subpoena for him to appear at the hearings in Atlanta Jan. 26.

.

“The election of President Obama by the presidential electors,
confirmed by Congress, makes the documents and testimony sought by
plaintiff irrelevant,” the lawyer said.

.

Judge Michael M. Malihi, however, took a different view.

.

“Defendant argues that ‘if enforced, [the subpoena] requires him to
interrupt duties as president of the United States’ to attend a hearing
in Atlanta, Georgia. However, defendant fails to provide any legal
authority to support his motion to quash the subpoena to attend,” he
wrote http://www.art2superpac.com/UserFiles/file/Farrar-We…hallenge.pdf

http://www.art2superpac.com/UserFiles/file/Farrar-We…hallenge.pdf

“Defendant’s motion suggests that no president should be compelled to
attend a court hearing. This may be correct. But defendant has failed
to enlighten the court with any legal authority,” the judge continued.

.

“Specifically, defendant has failed to cite to any legal authority
evidencing why his attendance is ‘unreasonable or oppressive, or that
the testimony … [is] irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and
unnecessary to a party’s preparation or presentation at the hearing, or
that basic fairness dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced.’”

.

Hearings have been scheduled for three separate complaints raised
against Obama’s candidacy. They all are raised by Georgia residents who
are challenging Obama’s name on the 2012 ballot for various reasons,
which they are allowed to do under state law.

It is states, usually through the office of secretary of state, that
run elections, not the federal government. The national election is
simply a compilation of the results of the individual elections within
states.

.

The schedule for the hearings was set by Malihi of the Georgia state
Office of State Administrative Hearings. In Georgia, a state law
requires “every candidate for federal” office who is certified by the
state executive committees of a political party or who files a notice of
candidacy “shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications
for holding the office being sought.”

.

State law also grants the secretary of state and any “elector who is
eligible to vote for a candidate” in the state the authority to raise a
challenge to a candidate’s qualifications, the judge determined.

.

Three different plaintiffs’ groups are lined up for separate
hearings, including one represented by California attorney Orly Taitz.
She had the judge sign a subpoena for Obama’s testimony, and Michael
Jablonski, Obama’s attorney for the cases, argued that he should be
exempted.

.

“Make no mistake about it. This is the beginning of Watergate Two or
ObamaForgeryGate. I believe this is the second time in the U.S. history a
sitting president is ordered to comply with a subpoena, and produce
documents, which might eventually bring criminal charges to the
president and a number of high-ranking individuals,” Taitz said.

.

She told WND that it’s been 40 years since any court issued such a ruling concerning a president.

.

Citizens bringing the complaints include David Farrar, Leah Lax, Cody Judy, Thomas Malaren and Laurie Roth, represented by http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/ David Weldon represented by attorney Van R. Irion http://www.libertylegalfoundation.com/1381/no-certif…verification and Carl Swensson and Kevin Richard Powell, http://www.art2superpac.com/georgiaballot.html

http://www.art2superpac.com/georgiaballot.html

http://www.scribd.com/doc/78807773/Swensson-Powell-v…ge-1-19-2012 asking for Obama’s documents and records.

He wants one of the two original certified copies of Obama’s  long-form birth certificate.

.

Also, required are medical, religious administrative and other
records about Obama’s birth; passports, applications and related
records; college and university applications; bar association
applications and materials; details on the citizenship of Obama’s father
and other documents.

.

Taitz had filed an opposition to the motion to quash, taking Obama
directly to task over what many consider an important constitutional
question – the eligibility of a presidential candidate.

.

“It is noteworthy, that [the quash request] comes on the heels of his
extended 17 day Hawaiian vacation, which cost U.S. taxpayers 4 million
dollars. Mr. Obama has earned a dubious distinction as a Vacationer in
Chief, Tourist in Chief, Partier in Chief and a Golfer in Chief due to
his endless vacations, parties and rounds of golf. Considering … it is
not too much to ask for Mr. Obama to show up once at a hearing and
present his original identification records, which were not seen by
anyone in the country yet,” she argued.

.

Obama’s attorney, Jablonski, also had argued that the state should mind its own business.

.

“The sovereignty of the state of Georgia does not extend beyond the
limits of the State. … Since the sovereignty of the state does not
extend beyond its territorial limits, an administrative subpoena has no
effect,” the filing argues.

.

Taitz’s supporters joined a discussion on her http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/ judging that Obama is on the defensive.

.

“What a joke. He claims to be too busy performing the duties of the
president of the United States. How many days of vacation has he taken?
How many rounds of golf? If he is too busy to provide the documents that
provide the basis for meeting the requirements of the office, then
perhaps he better sit out the next four years,” said one.

.

Wrote another, “The election of President Obama by the presidential
electors, confirmed by Congress, makes the documents and testimony
sought by plaintiff irrelevant. … This is complete utter nonsense!”

.

In fact, a presidential elector in California brought a lawsuit
challenging Obama’s eligibility at the time of the 2008 election and was
told the dispute was not yet ripe because the inauguration hadn’t taken
place. The courts later ruled that the elector lost his “standing” to
bring the lawsuit after the inauguration.

Obama canta clássico da black music em comício de campanha

Georgia eligibility challenge returns!

'Judge Malihi's ruling is ... contrary to the ruling of U.S. Supreme Court'

Obama announces change in contraceptive coverage rule after outcry

.

(...)

.

The announcement comes after a contentious week of debate in Washington and across the country about the rule, which stems from the federal health care overhaul. Religious groups, particularly Catholic organizations, decried the policy, while lawmakers on both sides of the aisle charged it was an infringement on religious freedom. 

Alabama billboard questions Obama

'Where's the REAL birth certificate?' appears

State warned Obama fails ballot requirements

'Both of candidates' parents must be U.S. citizens at time of candidate's birth'

WND TV to live-stream Arpaio eligibility report

March 1 news conference to announce findings of 1st official probe

Xerife nos EUA diz que certidão de nascimento de Obama 'pode ser falsa'

A certidão de nascimento do presidente dos Estados Unidos, Barack Obama,
pode ser falsa, segundo a autoridade policial máxima do condado de
Maricopa, do Estado do Arizona.

O xerife Joe Arpaio, que se diz o mais linha-dura do país, revelou os
resultados de uma investigação sobre as origens do documento.

Seus policiais concluíram que há "indícios" de que o documento tenha sido feito através de "falsificação e fraude".

Figura polêmica, Arpaio é um influente republicano e concorre ao sexto mandato como xerife.

Ele foi tema de um relatório do Departamento de Justiça americano em
dezembro, que diz que seus policiais usam raça como base para
investigações criminais, discriminam latinos e fazem prisões
arbitrárias.

PEDIDO DO TEA PARTY

Anunciando suas conclusões, Arpaio, de 79 anos, disse que a análise de
uma cópia eletrônica da certidão de nascimento de Obama havia revelado
grandes dúvidas sobre sua autenticidade.

"Baseado em todas as provas apresentadas e investigadas, eu não posso de
boa fé dizer a vocês que estes documentos são autênticos", disse
Arpaio.

"Meus investigadores acreditam que a certidão foi fabricada
eletronicamente e que não vem de um documento original de papel, como
alega a Casa Branca."

O governo americano divulgou a certidão de nascimento de Obama em abril
de 2011, em meio a especulações de que ele não era um cidadão nascido
nos Estados Unidos. Isso tornaria Obama, que tem pai queniano,
inelegível para o cargo de presidente.

PRESIDÊNCIA

A divulgação da certidão pareceu aplacar alguns dos críticos, incluindo o
executivo Donald Trump, que pediu publicamente esclarecimentos sobre o
assunto.

Mas Arpaio disse ter decidido investigar a questão da certidão mais a
fundo no ano passado, a pedido de integrantes do Tea Party do Arizona.

Segundo o xerife, a conclusão de que há indícios de falsificação torna
necessária uma investigação criminal e um maior escrutínio de candidatos
à Presidência no país.

"Se nada mais vier desta investigação, o que aprendemos é que precisamos
de um processo melhor para escolher as pessoas que concorrem à
Presidência dos Estados Unidos da América", disse Arpaio.

Críticos dizem que o xerife investiu na investigação sobre a certidão de
nascimento de Obama para desviar atenção de suas batalhas judiciais e
impulsionar sua campanha pela reeleição.

Arpaio nega as acusações e afirma: "Eu não estou perseguindo Obama. Estou apenas fazendo meu trabalho."

Hawaii official now swears: No Obama birth certificate

Signs affidavit declaring long-form, hospital-generated document absent

01/03/201:

Full Video of Sheriff Joe Arpaio Press Conference 3/1/12 - Obama Eligibility Cold Case Investigation

Sheriff Joe Arpaio suggests Obama's birth certificate is a forgery

Obama's Birth Certificate - Cold Case Posse & Sheriff Arpaio's Investigation (Parts 1 - 6)

Republicans call on Obama to clarify comment on missile defense 'flexibility'

.